How Society Presents Humans: Sexuality, Health, Beauty, Good Looks

Screenshot 2015-05-28 08.09.53

Magazine Cover Emphasis: Sex, Abs, Rich, & Muscles Rasmus, J. (2015, April). Diesel strength. Men’s Fitness (May).

Screenshot 2015-05-28 08.13.53

Magazine Cover Emphasis: Drop 5 Pounds, Epic Orgasms, & Anti-Aging Keller-Laird, A. (2015, April). Hey girl. Women’s Health (April).

Screenshot 2015-05-28 08.19.42

Bridal Week 2015 occurred recently and according to high-end bridal gown designers, dresses are moving towards sultry, provocative, and very revealing with more lingerie looks than ever before. *Photo from article listed below* La Ferla, R. (2015). At fashion week, sultry and proactive. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/20/fashion/at-bridal-fashion-week-sultry-and-provocative.html?_r=0#

My Reflections

How Society Presents Humans:

  • Sexual Beings
  • Always Seeking to Improve Life, Love, Health
  • Unsatisfied and Striving for “More”

Values in American Culture:

  • Sexuality
  • Health
  • Beauty
  • Good Looks
  • “Fighting Back” on Stereotype

Personal Reactions

  • Individuals are portrayed as simply material, physical beings
  • Lack of representation of emotional, intellectual, psychological wellness
  • The human body is portrayed as a playground
  • For sexuality primarily, but also for physical strength
  • Culture portrays consumerism at unprecedented rates
  • Advertisements often focus on sexuality to entice audiences
  • Culture’s definition of health varies greatly from Biblical standards
  • Wealth, career minded, fit, sexy & friendly reign supreme

By Tegan Pfortmiller–Wheaton College

Advertisements

Multi-tasking Super Person or Uni-function Person?

In an individualistic culture and business oriented world we tend to value productivity. Machines were designed with the capability to be multifunctional to help organizations or individual control and create their products. People have been encouraged to become like multi-tasking machines, trying to do as much as they can do in a single moment since time is limited, but the tasks keep increasing.  People are referred to as a supermom, superman, or superhero.

supermom

Those titles sound good in an individualistic and productive culture.  What happens, however, if an individual attempts to do things by themselves unaware of the heavy workload? Are we to see ourselves  like multifunction knife or printer? How long can someone maintain that life style? If people are seen like multi-tasking machines, will they end up be used and breaking down? This situation is not limited to the business world, but also evidenced in the Christian ministries and organizations. Maybe because some ministries lack people to do tasks, or some Christian leaders do not trust others to do tasks. In 1 Cor. 12, Paul tell us that individual believers are to be seen as part of a body. Each person plays an important role in the success of how the body functions. How does this apply to our lives?  How many time a month or a year do we seek to be a uni-functioning person–focusing on one task such as reading a book, cooking, spending time with our family, or working on one task. How often we look up to the sky or look at creation?  Scripture calls us to trust in God as our Helper ,rather than rely on ourselves.

By Chiraphon Chummongkhon Wheaton College

How does contemporary American culture understand and portray what it means to be a human person?

How does contemporary American culture understand and portray what it means to be a human person? Mark L. Taylor posed this question to his students in a Christian Anthropology course at Seattle University asking them to collect portrayals of the human person found ads, music lyrics, interviews, sermons, novels, movie scenes, TV shows, websites, lectures, social media, etc. I posed the same question to my graduate students in a Theological Anthropology course at Wheaton College.  I challenged them to reflect on how society is presenting human persons and what is your personal response to these portrayals. Below are some questions that helped guide their search for portrayals:

  • How does contemporary culture portray the human body?
  • How is sex/gender portrayed?
  • How does culture portray the person as an intellectual, psychological, material, emotional, or spiritual being?
  • How does culture portray persons as creators, consumers, and caretakers?
  • How are human persons presented as social, political, economic beings—how humans are involved in systems of wealth and poverty, power and marginality, justice and oppression?
  • What does it mean for a person to be healthy in our contemporary culture- mental health, spiritual health, physical health, and relational health?

In the next few weeks I post some of their findings.

Review of Kenneth G. Appold’s The Reformation: A Brief History.

51oeoOk5IFL._SY344_BO1,204,203,200_

Kenneth G. Appold, The Reformation: A Brief History, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011. 203 pages.

Kenneth G. Appold’s book The Reformation: A Brief History is a collective book upon the survey of Reformation history. Through understanding of late medieval church life and ecclesiology, the progress of Luther’s Reformation, and the ‘rural’ reformation, Appold’s book provides a small, but dense recap of the Reformation throughout 15th and 16th century Europe. Kenneth G. Appold is an Associate Professor of Reformation History at Princeton Theological Seminary. Since this book is a ‘brief’ Reformation book, Appold uses a collection of mostly secondary sources to help support the snippets of his overview. He uses, for example, Alister McGrath, who is known for publishing Christian Theology: An Introduction and Hans-Jurgen Goetz, who wrote on Reformation Anabaptist histories and figures. Appold does acknowledge that the book, with its emphasis on a brief history, is a deterrent to a historian’s perspective. Even though Appold mentions this, he argues that a brief history allows a development of a synthesis for the individual scholar and reader on the narrative scope of the time period. (p. viii-ix). Appold wanted to share his synthesis from this work, even though some areas will not be covered.

Appold’s structure of the book is chronological in its historical presentation. He first decides to outline the overview of the book by explaining the period before the Reformation, and how late medieval churches, customs, and societies had affected the forecast of ecclesial reform. One of the aspects of the affected forecast was church liturgy. According to Appold, the churches relation to the community and vice versa was ambivalent in attitude. (p. 5) There was not a lot of care for church discipline and worship, and peasant involvement within the church was usually for personal and social reasons. Attendance to the mass is common and the only important moment within the mass is the lifting of the host (the body of Christ) and the participation of the Eucharist.(p. 5) The common layperson, according to Appold, did not see the clergy as a person of religious authority but of religious instigation. Church administration and the performance of the sacraments were the only duties that the clergy had in the late medieval Catholic Church. Pastoral care was limited or even neglected and their relationships among laypeople were controversial and strained. The church was not the place to seek a religious experience. It was through pilgrimages and the veneration of icons and saints that an individual could receive a religious experience.

Even though Appold provides more reasons to the forecast of the Reformation, his overview example of Church liturgy provided a clear opening for his explanation on the direction to reform. The first section of the book is a solid foundation for the direction of his proposal– that the synthesis of understanding church life and church practices from the late to the early modern period was necessary for the development of a historical consensus. The second section of the book is Appold’s explanation of Luther’s Reformation. He dedicates the whole second section to the progression of Luther, which shows the reader his stress on the importance of Luther’s Reformation. Despite Appold’s description of Luther’s life and engagements, one area that Appold describes systematically is Luther’s theology. One example is Appold’s explanation of Luther’s epiphany on justification. Even through a condense book, Appold decides to add and reflect on Luther’s viewpoint on justification by referring back to early church scholarship and not just Luther’s exegesis.  Appold displays Luther’s pursuit of “ad fontes” within the church, and not his own created ideas. Appold references back to the controversy between Augustine and Pelagius during the 5th century, in which he argues that Pelagian concepts were in use within the Medieval church until Luther’s time. Appold describes the relationship through this description:

“While Augustine’s position prevailed theologically, Pelagian tendencies continued to resonate in the practical context of medieval missions and Christianization. The notion that people are free to choose a more moral life fits more conveniently with the kinds of exhortations to discipline that marked the mission effort.” (p. 72)

Luther was convinced that Augustine’s theology on justification, was the correct, biblical position, was not implemented within the Catholic Church. Augustine held the view that our justification was not reliant upon our individual powers or progressions, but on the full grace of God. The Pelagian view says that God already gave the disposition for humanity to sin or not to sin, meaning that God does not intervene with our justification. Instead, we have to merit for our justification. Appold’s synthesis of connecting early church ideas to the Reformation helps reveal that the Reformation was not a radical revolution, but a return to an early church foundation.

Last, Appold explains the ‘rural’ reformation. Appold admits that studies in Reformation history have neglected the ‘rural’ areas of the reformation and that “the majority population of Europe was not in the cities but in the countries.” (p. 103) In retrospect, the Reformation was not influential in scope, but its ideas had an impact on the medieval peasant’s status quo.  This led to attempts to rural reform of both church and government. Appold references some important figures within the movement like Hans Muller–the leader of the Black Forest Band– and the creators of the Twelve Articles– Christoph Shappeler and Sebastian Lotzer– who wrote the articles to “declare a declaration of independence amongst peasants and church orders.”(p. 108) Appold synthesizes the rural reformation in order to show that the Reformation was not only a church issue, but a governmental issue.  He then reflects back on how the church operates throughout Western Europe and its impact on the people.

Appold’s book helps expand our understanding of Reformation history. While this work lacks references to the English Reformation, Appold’s goal is to present a synthesis of the problem of church unity, which was fully addressed through Luther’s reformation. (p. ix) He sets out to address the main issue of the Reformation, church unity.  He focuses on the Lutheran movement to explain the reiteration of church unity throughout Europe. The book is not a comprehensive book of Reformation history, but a reflective book on the progression of Reformation history. He wants the readers to understand the importance of synthesis when dealing with a certain topic or argument in history and that mass detail should be compatible with brief detail. Appold’s book should be very fitting to a Reformation student and scholar, and in my opinion a recommended book for revisiting the Reformation, and how to synthesis a historical overview into a collective view.

 By Kou Xiong–Wheaton College